Glastory: Tempering energy-consumption claims

Date: 7 March 2025
Copyright:
  • Riku Färm | Glaston

Date: 7 March 2025

Modern tempering technologies offer impressive energy efficiencies for glass processors. But, have you ever come across energy-saving claims that seem too good to be true?

Author: Riku Färm | Glaston

Source: glastory.net

Modern tempering technologies bring glass processors significant energy efficiencies. However, some tempering line manufacturers make energy-saving claims that sound too good to be true. Usually, these claims are just that – untrue.

Below are two claims I’ve come across recently. If you hear either of these, you can be sure you are being misled.

Claim #1: 4 mm glass tempering with energy consumption under 1.3 kWh/m²

Understanding what is physically possible can help you see through over-blown claims. The good news is that you don’t need to be a physicist to do so.  Just remember the following equivalency: 1.9 kWh/m² for 4 mm glass.

Any claim to temper 4 mm glass with less energy than this is a clear sign of a scam.

Here’s an example of an actual claim made by one tempering line manufacturer:

  • Glass thickness: 4 mm
  • Production output: 102.4 m² per hour
  • Energy consumption per hour: 130 kWh

-> Claim – Energy consumption: 1.27 kWh/m²

The problem is that heating glass from room temperature to 630 °C requires at least 1.9 kWh/m².  This is the absolute minimum without any losses.

It doesn’t matter whether you are turning heaters on and off – or controlling convection based on where glass travels in the furnace. A 4  mm glass sheet will always absorb at least 1.9 kWh/m², regardless of how you heat.

Additionally, energy is always needed due to heat losses and for quenching and cooling, making it physically impossible to achieve a lower value in practice.

Claims like the one above contradict the laws of physics.

Actual consumption depends on glass thickness, loading efficiency and how well the process is optimized, but even under ideal conditions, 4 mm glass requires at least 2.5–3.0 kWh/m².

This blog provides some other valuable facts about your tempering line energy usage – and how to minimize it.

Claim #2: The assertion that the energy consumption of claim #1 has been proven

Seeing is believing, they say – but sometimes even this is misleading.

If you see something that contradicts the laws of physics, it cannot be true.

In this case of this claim, there are at least two possible reasons for inaccurate or misleading measurements:

1. Measuring only a single load in a preheated furnace

With proper recipe settings and if the furnace and its structures are already hot, a single glass load can indeed be heated with minimal additional energy. Under these circumstances, the furnace operates in its most energy-efficient state, making it the ideal moment for measurements.

This scenario creates an illusion of low energy consumption. Under actual production conditions, however, the furnace always needs to compensate for heat absorbed by the glass. To get an accurate picture, energy consumption should always be measured over a longer period.

2. Not accounting for compressed air

If the furnace uses compressed air, the energy needed for the compressor is often not measured or included in the total energy consumption. This can result in misleadingly low figures.

Empty promises?

Don’t get me wrong – today’s technology offers truly great energy-saving opportunities. However, watch out for misleading claims about low tempering line energy consumption. These promises may sound appealing, but decisions based on them will be disappointing.

Whether you are considering a completely new furnace or an energy-efficient upgrade, turn to a reputable tempering line manufacturer who can help you make an informed decision based on facts.

If you’d like to dive deeper into this topic, check out the links below.

600450 Glastory: Tempering energy-consumption claims glassonweb.com

Others also read

The latest Glastory blog explores the evolving role of automation in glass processing, highlighting examples of how it is transforming efficiency in the industry.
Optical stress measurement in tempered glass has its challenges. Stresses can be measured optically based on the optical anisotropy behavior of the glass.
What glass processes gain the most from automation? In this blog, we’ll focus on some of the particularly promising application areas.
When finding, training and retaining personnel for routine jobs is a challenge, processing automation offers a game-changing solution.
This paper aims to quantify the savings achieved through the ERM of secondary layer addition to existing glazed facades, for a high WWR office building in cooling and heating dominated climate locations.
In this latest Glastory blog, Uwe Risle explains why thin triple IG units are gaining popularity and what the key differences are between thin triple IGUs and other insulating glass types.

FROM INDUSTRY

ARTICLES RELATED PRODUCTS

Add new comment